Complete List 2025: Top 20 Best China Trading Companies

If you’re ready to shortlist partners and request quotes now, this 2025 list was built for you. We combined reputable China trading companies and sourcing agents so you can compare models side-by-side, match by use case, and contact 2–4 high-fit candidates today—without wading through vague promises.

Below you’ll find plain-English profiles with best-for scenarios, capabilities, known fee transparency, and practical pros/cons. No hype—just enough depth to help you move forward with confidence.

How we chose (2025)

We evaluated publicly available information from 2024–2025 and prioritized firms that:

1. Clearly describe services and categories.
2. Demonstrate quality control and compliance literacy.
3. Offer logistics know-how for e-commerce (FCL/LCL, DDP, FBA prep) or specialized niches.
4. Show credible signals (documentation, thought leadership, or third-party recognition).

Criteria weights used: capability match & customization (25%), QC/compliance (20%), pricing transparency (15%), MOQs/flexibility (10%), logistics competence (10%), evidence/reliability (15%), support & responsiveness (5%).

Quick model refresher: A trading company typically buys from factories and resells; a sourcing agent typically represents the buyer to identify, verify, negotiate, and manage suppliers while you purchase directly. Many providers blend both.

Methodological note: Fees/MOQs vary by product and are subject to change. Where a provider publishes fee tiers, we cite it; otherwise, plan to confirm scope and pricing during discovery.

---

The 20 shortlists buyers actually use

Each card is skimmable: positioning, capabilities, and realistic trade‑offs.

1. Yansourcing — Best for private‑label e‑commerce brands that want one‑stop sourcing + QC + FBA logistics support (sourcing agent)

• Strengths: End‑to‑end buyer representation from supplier discovery to production, AQL‑based inspections with third‑party integration, FBA/marketplace workflows, packaging/branding coordination, and door‑to‑door shipping support.
• Fees/MOQs: Project‑based; confirm scope and commission during consultation (subject to change).
• Pros: Buyer‑side advocacy; private label focus; consolidated logistics and prep for Amazon/Shopify.
• Cons: Not a fit if you need an exporter of record to resell goods as a distributor.
• Best for: DTC brands and FBA sellers building a product line.
• Not for: One‑off personal orders or micro‑budgets.

2. ET2C International — Best for multi‑country sourcing and risk mitigation (sourcing partner)

• Core: China plus India/Vietnam/Türkiye diversification; compliance and QC content is a strong emphasis.
• Evidence: Their 2024–2025 content outlines risk frameworks in ET2C’s Global Sourcing 101 (2024).
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Multiregional footprint; compliance‑forward.
• Cons: Enterprise tone; fees not public.
• Best for: Brands hedging China risk with alternative country options.

3. Dragon Sourcing — Best for procurement outsourcing at scale (sourcing partner)

• Core: Supplier qualification, audits, and managed procurement programs.
• Evidence: Recognition noted in Dragon Sourcing ranks among top 25 procurement outsourcing providers (Everest Group, 2024).
• Fees/MOQs: Case‑by‑case; mixes fixed and performance structures.
• Pros: Mature procurement methods; suitable for complex categories.
• Cons: Less transparent pricing on public pages; may skew to larger engagements.
• Best for: Companies needing category strategy plus execution.

4. Easy Imex — Best for end‑to‑end importer workflows (sourcing agent)

• Core: Sourcing → sampling → QC → shipping; built for non‑experts who want one accountable partner.
• Fees/MOQs: Not public; request a quote.
• Pros: Clear importer journey and education; door‑to‑door mindset.
• Cons: Limited public fee detail; confirm FBA/labeling specifics.
• Best for: First‑time or time‑poor importers.

5. JingSourcing — Best for low‑MOQ private label and Yiwu market access (sourcing agent)

• Core: Private label, packaging, and category breadth via Yiwu wholesale ecosystems.
• Evidence: Private label scope shown on JingSourcing’s private label & packaging page (accessed 2025).
• Fees/MOQs: Commission tiers often discussed externally; confirm directly.
• Pros: Flexible MOQs for new SKUs; strong packaging coordination.
• Cons: Marketing‑heavy content; vet factory depth for technical goods.
• Best for: Accessories, home goods, giftables, and early‑stage brands.

6. Maple Sourcing — Best for QC rigor with transparent service descriptions (sourcing agent)

• Core: Supplier verification, factory audits, process control, and inspections.
• Evidence: Scope detailed on Maple Sourcing quality control (accessed 2025).
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Clear QC program descriptions; Shenzhen advantage for electronics and accessories.
• Cons: Pricing not public; confirm category fit.
• Best for: Teams who want QC documentation and audit structure up front.

7. Asiaction Sourcing — Best for inspection‑heavy projects and packaging supervision (sourcing agent)

• Core: Order follow‑up, in‑process and pre‑shipment inspections, packaging checks, and shipping management.
• Evidence: Process overview on Asiaction shipping management (accessed 2025).
• Fees/MOQs: Project‑based.
• Pros: Strong operational oversight; detailed documentation.
• Cons: QC steps can lengthen timelines; fees not public.
• Best for: Brands that have faced quality slippage and need tighter control.

8. EJET Sourcing/Procurement — Best for fee transparency among Yiwu‑rooted agents (sourcing agent)

• Core: Sourcing, branding, inspections, consolidation, and FBA support; LATAM experience.
• Evidence: A public plan page shows structures like a 5% commission plan; see EJET pricing (subject to change; accessed 2025).
• Pros: Unusual level of pricing clarity; Yiwu market know‑how.
• Cons: Multiple domains; confirm corporate entity and scope.
• Best for: Sellers who value upfront budget math.

9. Leeline Sourcing — Best for Amazon FBA workflows with published fee tiers (sourcing agent)

• Core: FBA prep, labeling, compliance checks, and end‑to‑end sourcing.
• Evidence: Published tiers on Leeline price & payment (accessed 2025; subject to change).
• Pros: Clear FBA content and services; transparent model for planning.
• Cons: Marketing heavy; vet category depth for complex products.
• Best for: Amazon‑first sellers scaling SKUs.

10. Foshan Sourcing — Best for furniture and building materials (sourcing agent)

• Core: Factory tours, QC, and logistics tailored to furniture, tiles, doors, and fixtures.
• Evidence: Niche focus illustrated in the 2025 guide to import furniture from China.
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Deep local industry network; on‑site coordination.
• Cons: Narrower category scope by design.
• Best for: Builders, developers, and furniture brands.

11. Goldenshiny Trading — Best for Yiwu market sourcing + consolidation (trading company)

• Core: Market guiding, order tracking, QC, warehousing, container loading, customs filing, and shipping.
• Evidence: Updated Yiwu overviews like Yiwu Market 2025 guide.
• Fees/MOQs: Not public.
• Pros: One‑stop Yiwu operations; practical shipping stack.
• Cons: Focused on Yiwu ecosystem; confirm factory‑direct needs.
• Best for: Broad product mix and market‑sourced lines.

12. CJdropshipping — Best for dropship and print‑on‑demand with China origin (platform/trading hybrid)

• Core: Product sourcing, private labeling, global warehouses, and store integrations.
• Evidence: Active 2025 content such as Top US dropshipping suppliers for 2025.
• Fees/MOQs: Platform model; pay for goods + shipping; extras for value‑added services.
• Pros: Fast testing and fulfillment at small quantities.
• Cons: Not ideal for bulk OEM with custom tooling.
• Best for: Testing product‑market fit or low‑MOQ catalog expansion.

13. China2West (C2W) — Best for OEM/ODM and IP‑secure assembly (sourcing/manufacturing partner)

• Core: Contract manufacturing, QC/inspection, and IP protection via its Shield Works facilities.
• Evidence: Process education in their OEM guides; start with the OEM manufacturing explainer (2024–2025) on their site.
• Fees/MOQs: Project‑based.
• Pros: Manufacturing depth; emphasis on IP controls.
• Cons: More manufacturer‑partner than classic trading company.
• Best for: Brands developing custom products with protectable IP.

14. KeenSourcing — Best for e‑commerce shipping pragmatism (sourcing agent)

• Core: Sourcing with content on FBA pathways and shipping options.
• Evidence: Their FBA shipping overview helps frame choices for beginners; see the KeenSourcing FBA post (accessed 2025).
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Practical e‑commerce‑oriented content; approachable for small teams.
• Cons: Limited public fee details.
• Best for: Early‑stage Amazon sellers.

15. Supplyia — Best for buyers who want side‑by‑side platform/agent options (sourcing agent)

• Core: Sourcing and QC; also publishes comparisons and educational posts.
• Fees/MOQs: Not clearly published; verify during discovery.
• Pros: Educational coverage helps set expectations.
• Cons: Evidence on performance outcomes is limited publicly.
• Best for: Buyers wanting a teaching‑forward partner.

16. Asian Sourcing Group (ASG) — Best for multi‑category sourcing with a single coordinator (sourcing partner)

• Core: Buyer representation across broad categories; supply‑chain solutions.
• Evidence: Service positioning and updates on the ASG site (2024–2025).
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Wide category coverage; centralized coordination.
• Cons: Limited public fee metrics.
• Best for: Retailers with diverse SKU portfolios.

17. Tanndy Ltd — Best for ground support and supplier selection in South China (sourcing agent)

• Core: Supplier vetting, QA, fulfillment, and logistics; publishes roundups of agents and methods for transparency.
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Pragmatic, on‑the‑ground coordination.
• Cons: Fees not public; confirm category depth.
• Best for: Buyers planning China visits or trade‑show loops.

18. Minden Sourcing — Best for buyer education with sourcing and QC support (sourcing agent)

• Core: Supplier vetting, QC, and logistics; publishes step‑by‑step guides for non‑experts.
• Fees/MOQs: Not public.
• Pros: Educational guidance; straightforward scope descriptions.
• Cons: Limited third‑party validation.
• Best for: First‑time importers who value hand‑holding.

19. Tiroflx — Best for western‑owned sourcing and manufacturing coordination (sourcing/manufacturing agent)

• Core: Sourcing plus production oversight; emphasizes experience working with western clients.
• Fees/MOQs: Quote‑based.
• Pros: Cultural/communication familiarity; manufacturing coordination.
• Cons: Verify factory coverage by category.
• Best for: Teams seeking western account management on China ground.

20. Owlsourcing — Best for buyers who want conceptual clarity before committing (educational + sourcing services)

• Core: Detailed explainers on trading company vs. agent models and scenario‑based guidance; offers sourcing services.
• Fees/MOQs: Not public.
• Pros: Clarity on when to use which partner type.
• Cons: Less operations detail in public materials; confirm QC program depth.
• Best for: Founders still refining their procurement approach.

---

Practical verification steps before you commit

• Paperwork first: Verify business license and tax registration. For high‑risk categories, consider independent factory audits and AQL‑based inspections.
• Quote hygiene: Ask for line‑item quotes (EXW/FOB/DDP), sample and tooling costs, and payment terms. Expect some cost variability due to FY2025 customs fee adjustments noted in the U.S. Federal Register’s Customs user fees for FY2025 (2024).
• E‑commerce fit: If you sell on Amazon/Shopify, confirm FBA prep (labels, carton markings), packaging compliance, and DDP or IOR arrangements.
• Compliance mindset: For U.S./EU routes, discuss restricted‑entity screening, materials traceability, and test/reporting requirements early.

Data freshness and limitations

• Research window: We prioritized 2024–2025 sources and official pages. Where fees are public, we linked them; where not, treat all fee/MOQ mentions as indicative and subject to change.
• Evidence density varies: Several providers publish strong education but little pricing detail. That’s normal in this market—plan a discovery call to confirm specifics before you commit.

Next step: Get a shortlist built around your product

If you’d like an expert to vet factories, coordinate sampling, and manage QC/logistics end‑to‑end for your next SKU, request a free sourcing consultation with Yansourcing. We’ll discuss your product, budget, timelines, and the fastest path to reliable suppliers.